|Supporting Listening Comprehension and Vocabulary Acquisition with Multimedia Annotations: The Students’ Voice|
|Volume and Page||Vol. 21, No. 1; August 2003, Hlm: 41-65|
|Writter||Linda C. Jones|
|Date||20th Mei, 2016|
|Purpose of Research||Listening comprehension activities provide students with the aural component of the target language to help them better hear the intricate sounds, enunciations, and content and develop their abilities to communicate with others in a target language|
|Subject of Research||English-speaking students enrolled in second semester beginning French at the University of Arkansas|
|Data Assesment||The Research uses several ways :
1. Demographic Questionnaire
3. Data Analysis
|Method of Research||The Research Use two Methods:
1. Quantitative Component
2. Qualitative Method
|Stage of Result||The Research is divided into several stages :
Preparing for Strategic Planning for Students’ Voice
Setting Up The Matter of Pretest and Posttest for Observation on students’ comprehension of the aural passage and their acquisition of vocabulary
Determine The Steps and Scoring
Preparing the Materials which will be used for Research to Supporting Listening Comprehension and Vocabulary Acquisition with Multimedia Annotations
|Result of Research||The Analysis Result of The Research Conducted is :
The students performed best when they had access to visual and verbal annotations, moderately well when they had access to visual or verbal annotations alone, and poorest when no annotations were available to them. In most instances, access to multiple annotations led to significantly higher results than the other annotations. Students’ voices, in addition to the quantitative results summarized above, extend Mayer’s generative theory of multimedia learning to listening comprehension since selection from the material available and construction of referential connections between visual, verbal, and aural representations gave students more retrieval routes to the information to recall vocabulary words and to comprehend the passage.
|Strength ofResearch||1. The Theoretical Basis is Right
2. Using many of The Analysis Methods
|Weakness ofResearch||There are several materials which can be enhanced, namely:
1. Quantitative Component
Nothing treatment foundation for use it, it has to include references from books or articles about the use of treatment.
“(a) without access to annotations, (b) with only verbal annotations available, (c) with only visual annotations available, and (d) with both visual and verbal annotations available”
Detail about the pretest and post-test was not included, so it does not convince the reader that strategy was carried out or not.
No attachments on what is being asked to students at the time in interview takes place.
Data analysis is little bit, it seems less convincing in research conducted.
|Conclusion||This research is still in need of repair, so it needs for criticism and suggestions.
The strategy used to be very helpful in this research.
In this journal can help the student to the face listening comprehension.